Forum Search:
RSD No Spam
rec.sport.disc without the spam


Home » RSD » RSD Posts » Ultimate History - Updates from GM and WM
Ultimate History - Updates from GM and WM [message #100448] Sun, 10 July 2011 14:59 Go to next message
Joe Seidler
Messages: 482
Registered: September 2008
Location: San Francisco
Senior Member
I updated the Grand Masters and Women Masters results on the Ultimate
History website. Philadelphia and Vancouver move up on the list of
cities with the most National Champions going ahead of Boulder (note
table 2 of 3 on this link):
http://www.ultimatehistory.com/teamcityrankings/Pg/citiessum mary.html
Re: Ultimate History - Updates from GM and WM [message #100455 is a reply to message #100448] Sun, 10 July 2011 17:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Knappy
Messages: 830
Registered: September 2008
Senior Member
Congrats to Scrapple for a well earned Grandmasters title!

ummmmm, breakfast meat.....

Re: Ultimate History - Updates from GM and WM [message #100493 is a reply to message #100448] Mon, 11 July 2011 13:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Joe Seidler
Messages: 482
Registered: September 2008
Location: San Francisco
Senior Member
On Jul 10, 2:59 pm, Joe Seidler <j...@seidler.com> wrote:
> I updated the Grand Masters and Women Masters results on the Ultimate
> History website. Philadelphia and Vancouver move up on the list of
> cities with the most National Champions going ahead of Boulder (note
> table 2 of 3 on this link) :http://www.ultimatehistory.com/teamcityrankings/Pg/citiessu mmary.html

I had omitted the Boudler 2004 College Nat'l. Championship, so Boulder
is now tied with Philadelphia and still just slightly ahead of
Vancouver.

Question about MN:
Should the Twin Cities and Northfield (Carleton) be combined into the
same city? This might be like the SF Bay Area where SF teams and
Stanford (in Palo Alto) all count towards the SF Bay Area wins.
Re: Ultimate History - Updates from GM and WM [message #100495 is a reply to message #100493] Mon, 11 July 2011 13:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jeff
Messages: 338
Registered: September 2008
Senior Member
http://www.metrocouncil.org/census/KeyFacts/MetropolitanArea Definitions.pdf

this may help
Re: Ultimate History - Updates from GM and WM [message #100496 is a reply to message #100493] Mon, 11 July 2011 13:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mgd.mitch
Messages: 1207
Registered: January 2009
Senior Member
Joe Seidler wrote on Mon, 11 July 2011 16:12

Question about MN:
Should the Twin Cities and Northfield (Carleton) be combined into the same city? This might be like the SF Bay Area where SF teams and Stanford (in Palo Alto) all count towards the SF Bay Area wins.
Distance-wise, Northfield to Minneapolis (~40 mi) is similar to Palo Alto to San Fran (~30 mi), but as I recall it's a pretty developed ~30 miles versus far less developed ~40 miles. For the purpose of this measure, I think it would be reasonable to include northfield as part of the twin cities... but in terms of where the players migrate, isn't northfield more aptly a suburb of Seattle? Smile
Re: Ultimate History - Updates from GM and WM [message #100500 is a reply to message #100448] Mon, 11 July 2011 14:31 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rsdaccount
Messages: 125
Registered: March 2011
Senior Member
If he's giving Santa Barbara credit for all those wins using south Bay Area players and Los Angeles players... I'm sure he can include Northfield with Minneapolis.

All his metrics are designed to benefit Santa Barbara. Keep that in mind as you view his "ultimate history."
Re: Ultimate History - Updates from GM and WM [message #100509 is a reply to message #100500] Mon, 11 July 2011 17:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Joe Seidler
Messages: 482
Registered: September 2008
Location: San Francisco
Senior Member
On Jul 11, 2:35 pm, rsdaccount <rsdacco...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> If he's giving Santa Barbara credit for all those wins using
> south Bay Area players and Los Angeles players... I'm sure
> he can include Northfield with Minneapolis.  
>
> All his metrics are designed to benefit Santa Barbara.  Keep
> that in mind as you view his "ultimate history."  
> --
> Posted fromhttp://www.rsdnospam.com

Whoever you are, you are as wrong as the GOP. I would be happy to
combine the Twin Cities and Northfield if that's the appropriate thing
to do; that's why I'm asking.

As for your rant about players from a different region, every team is
allowed a small number of "remote" players. It used to be limited to
5, but I'm not sure what it is now. The data for Santa Barbara was
earned as was every other city's stats.

Where are you from?
Re: Ultimate History - Updates from GM and WM [message #100525 is a reply to message #100500] Tue, 12 July 2011 10:19 Go to previous message
pizzaslot
Messages: 134
Registered: November 2008
Senior Member
On Jul 11, 4:35 pm, rsdaccount <rsdacco...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> If he's giving Santa Barbara credit for all those wins using
> south Bay Area players and Los Angeles players... I'm sure
> he can include Northfield with Minneapolis.  
>
> All his metrics are designed to benefit Santa Barbara.  Keep
> that in mind as you view his "ultimate history."  
> --
> Posted fromhttp://www.rsdnospam.com

It's a local call from MN to Northfield, if that means anything (or if
people still use landlines).
Previous Topic:Summer Frisbee Bash 2011
Next Topic:NexGen vs. Furious George full game FREE
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Apr 1 04:51:49 PDT 2020
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.0RC2.
Copyright ©2001-2009 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software