Forum Search:
RSD No Spam
rec.sport.disc without the spam


Home » RSD » RSD Posts » South Regionals...
Re: South Regionals... [message #20204 is a reply to message #20201] Wed, 22 April 2009 08:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Torre
Messages: 226
Registered: September 2008
Senior Member
On Apr 22, 11:23 am, The Dick Formerly Known As Dennis
<isar...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> http://upa.org/scores/tourn.cgi?div=127&id=5921

Teams
1. Texas 2543 TEX
2. Kansas 2591 OZ
3. Arkansas 2365 OZ
4. North Texas 2463 TEX
5. Texas State 2488 TEX
6. Wash University 2365 OZ
7. Texas A & M 2457 TEX
8. LSU 2364 BAMA
9. Truman State 2458 OZ
10. Missouri 2332 OZ
11. Rice 2315 TEX
12. Mississippi 2333 BAM
13. Harding 2287 OZ
14. Mississippi State 2169 BAM
15. Houston 2205 TEX
16. Texas-Arlington 2002 TEX
Re: South Regionals... [message #20205 is a reply to message #20204] Wed, 22 April 2009 08:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Torre
Messages: 226
Registered: September 2008
Senior Member

>
> Teams
> 1. Texas        2543                            TEX
> 2. Kansas       2591                            OZ
> 3. Arkansas     2365                   OZ
> 4. North Texas  2463                   TEX
> 5. Texas State  2488                   TEX
> 6. Wash University      2365            OZ
> 7. Texas A & M      2457                   TEX
> 8. LSU  2364                           BAMA
> 9. Truman State 2458                   OZ
> 10. Missouri    2332                   OZ
> 11. Rice        2315                            TEX
> 12. Mississippi 2333                   BAM
> 13. Harding     2287                   OZ
> 14. Mississippi State   2169          BAM
> 15. Houston     2205                   TEX
> 16. Texas-Arlington     2002          TEX
giving us:

1:Texas
16:Texas-Arlington

9:Truman State
8:LSU

5:Texas State
12:Mississippi

13:Harding
4:North Texas

3:Arkansas
14:Mississippi State

11:Rice
6:Washington University

7:Texas A & M
10:Missouri

15:Houston
2:Kansas
Re: South Regionals... [message #20250 is a reply to message #20205] Wed, 22 April 2009 12:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
D Rich
Messages: 19
Registered: September 2008
Junior Member
I realize that the bracket was formed by the overall seeding each team
got, but can they not switch some spots around. The way it looks
right now is that the Texas Section will battle it out in the top and
the Ozark Section will battle it out in the bottom. Can they not
switch Texas State/Wash U or UNT/Arkansas? I don't think that would
make that big of a deal.
Re: South Regionals... [message #20253 is a reply to message #20250] Wed, 22 April 2009 12:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rhb
Messages: 35
Registered: October 2008
Member
On Apr 22, 2:15 pm, david...@gmail.com wrote:
> I realize that the bracket was formed by the overall seeding each team
> got, but can they not switch some spots around.  The way it looks
> right now is that the Texas Section will battle it out in the top and
> the Ozark Section will battle it out in the bottom.  Can they not
> switch Texas State/Wash U or UNT/Arkansas?  I don't think that would
> make that big of a deal.

Who is this? Docter?
Re: South Regionals... [message #20255 is a reply to message #20250] Wed, 22 April 2009 12:47 Go to previous messageGo to next message
clrydin
Messages: 30
Registered: October 2008
Member
On Apr 22, 2:15 pm, david...@gmail.com wrote:
> I realize that the bracket was formed by the overall seeding each team
> got, but can they not switch some spots around.  The way it looks
> right now is that the Texas Section will battle it out in the top and
> the Ozark Section will battle it out in the bottom.  Can they not
> switch Texas State/Wash U or UNT/Arkansas?  I don't think that would
> make that big of a deal.


I understand your argument, but hypothetically... Texas State is the 5-
seed, that puts them in a second round matchup against the 4-seed. If
you switch them, they have to play the 3-seed which you could argue is
a disadvantage they don't deserve, and Arkansas is also at a
disadvantage having to play the them, as opposed to the team that
deserves to be the 6-seed.

I completely understand what you are saying, but teams could be
considered at a disadvantage if you switch seeding based on matchups.

-casey
Re: South Regionals... [message #20259 is a reply to message #20255] Wed, 22 April 2009 12:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
D Rich
Messages: 19
Registered: September 2008
Junior Member
On Apr 22, 2:47 pm, Clrydin34 <clry...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2:15 pm, david...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I realize that the bracket was formed by the overall seeding each team
> > got, but can they not switch some spots around.  The way it looks
> > right now is that the Texas Section will battle it out in the top and
> > the Ozark Section will battle it out in the bottom.  Can they not
> > switch Texas State/Wash U or UNT/Arkansas?  I don't think that would
> > make that big of a deal.
>
> I understand your argument, but hypothetically... Texas State is the 5-
> seed, that puts them in a second round matchup against the 4-seed. If
> you switch them, they have to play the 3-seed which you could argue is
> a disadvantage they don't deserve, and Arkansas is also at a
> disadvantage having to play the them, as opposed to the team that
> deserves to be the 6-seed.
>
> I completely understand what you are saying, but teams could be
> considered at a disadvantage if you switch seeding based on matchups.
>
> -casey

I would just like to see the teams in the semis play teams that would
not be from their own section.

D Rich
(that better Bigley)
Re: South Regionals... [message #20261 is a reply to message #20259] Wed, 22 April 2009 13:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jack
Messages: 46
Registered: September 2008
Member
On Apr 22, 2:57 pm, david...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2:47 pm, Clrydin34 <clry...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 22, 2:15 pm, david...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > I realize that the bracket was formed by the overall seeding each team
> > > got, but can they not switch some spots around.  The way it looks
> > > right now is that the Texas Section will battle it out in the top and
> > > the Ozark Section will battle it out in the bottom.  Can they not
> > > switch Texas State/Wash U or UNT/Arkansas?  I don't think that would
> > > make that big of a deal.
>
> > I understand your argument, but hypothetically... Texas State is the 5-
> > seed, that puts them in a second round matchup against the 4-seed. If
> > you switch them, they have to play the 3-seed which you could argue is
> > a disadvantage they don't deserve, and Arkansas is also at a
> > disadvantage having to play the them, as opposed to the team that
> > deserves to be the 6-seed.
>
> > I completely understand what you are saying, but teams could be
> > considered at a disadvantage if you switch seeding based on matchups.
>
> > -casey
>
> I would just like to see the teams in the semis play teams that would
> not be from their own section.
>
> D Rich
> (that better Bigley)

I just don't really see how sectional affiliation should be a factor.
This isn't a tournament where regional diversity of competition should
play any role in scheduling (at least not a role that outweighs more
merit-based factors). If two Texan teams are deemed to be the 4th and
5th best teams in the region, they should be playing each other; it
shouldn't matter than they're both Texan teams. Like Casey said, if a
team is the 5th best team in the region (based on merit) and you make
them the sixth just for the sake of regional diversity, you are
harming the 3rd seed and helping the 4th seed by creating 3/5 and 4/6
matchups. At this point in the season, you have earned your seed at
regionals, and should have to play whoever else has earned their
corresponding seed. Especially when it gets to semis or finals, you
can't account for sectional affiliation.

Jack
(Don't worry D Rich, I hate Bigley too)
Re: South Regionals... [message #20263 is a reply to message #20261] Wed, 22 April 2009 13:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
D Rich
Messages: 19
Registered: September 2008
Junior Member
On Apr 22, 3:12 pm, Jack <Jac...@ku.edu> wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2:57 pm, david...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 22, 2:47 pm, Clrydin34 <clry...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 22, 2:15 pm, david...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > I realize that the bracket was formed by the overall seeding each team
> > > > got, but can they not switch some spots around.  The way it looks
> > > > right now is that the Texas Section will battle it out in the top and
> > > > the Ozark Section will battle it out in the bottom.  Can they not
> > > > switch Texas State/Wash U or UNT/Arkansas?  I don't think that would
> > > > make that big of a deal.
>
> > > I understand your argument, but hypothetically... Texas State is the 5-
> > > seed, that puts them in a second round matchup against the 4-seed. If
> > > you switch them, they have to play the 3-seed which you could argue is
> > > a disadvantage they don't deserve, and Arkansas is also at a
> > > disadvantage having to play the them, as opposed to the team that
> > > deserves to be the 6-seed.
>
> > > I completely understand what you are saying, but teams could be
> > > considered at a disadvantage if you switch seeding based on matchups.
>
> > > -casey
>
> > I would just like to see the teams in the semis play teams that would
> > not be from their own section.
>
> > D Rich
> > (that better Bigley)
>
> I just don't really see how sectional affiliation should be a factor.
> This isn't a tournament where regional diversity of competition should
> play any role in scheduling (at least not a role that outweighs more
> merit-based factors).  If two Texan teams are deemed to be the 4th and
> 5th best teams in the region, they should be playing each other; it
> shouldn't matter than they're both Texan teams.  Like Casey said, if a
> team is the 5th best team in the region (based on merit) and you make
> them the sixth just for the sake of regional diversity, you are
> harming the 3rd seed and helping the 4th seed by creating 3/5 and 4/6
> matchups.  At this point in the season, you have earned your seed at
> regionals, and should have to play whoever else has earned their
> corresponding seed.  Especially when it gets to semis or finals, you
> can't account for sectional affiliation.
>
> Jack
> (Don't worry D Rich, I hate Bigley too)

Good point. I guess that is why they have the back door game.

Well good luck to all teams and I wish I could be there to get drunk
and heckle with all the Alumn from rival schools.

D Rich
(Still trying to figure out which Grad school will accept me next year
so I can use my last year of eligibility)
Re: South Regionals... [message #20276 is a reply to message #20261] Wed, 22 April 2009 15:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kdoe
Messages: 33
Registered: September 2008
Member
On Apr 22, 3:12 pm, Jack <Jac...@ku.edu> wrote:
> On Apr 22, 2:57 pm, david...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 22, 2:47 pm, Clrydin34 <clry...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 22, 2:15 pm, david...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > I realize that the bracket was formed by the overall seeding each team
> > > > got, but can they not switch some spots around.  The way it looks
> > > > right now is that the Texas Section will battle it out in the top and
> > > > the Ozark Section will battle it out in the bottom.  Can they not
> > > > switch Texas State/Wash U or UNT/Arkansas?  I don't think that would
> > > > make that big of a deal.
>
> > > I understand your argument, but hypothetically... Texas State is the 5-
> > > seed, that puts them in a second round matchup against the 4-seed. If
> > > you switch them, they have to play the 3-seed which you could argue is
> > > a disadvantage they don't deserve, and Arkansas is also at a
> > > disadvantage having to play the them, as opposed to the team that
> > > deserves to be the 6-seed.
>
> > > I completely understand what you are saying, but teams could be
> > > considered at a disadvantage if you switch seeding based on matchups.
>
> > > -casey
>
> > I would just like to see the teams in the semis play teams that would
> > not be from their own section.
>
> > D Rich
> > (that better Bigley)
>
> I just don't really see how sectional affiliation should be a factor.
> This isn't a tournament where regional diversity of competition should
> play any role in scheduling (at least not a role that outweighs more
> merit-based factors).  If two Texan teams are deemed to be the 4th and
> 5th best teams in the region, they should be playing each other; it
> shouldn't matter than they're both Texan teams.  Like Casey said, if a
> team is the 5th best team in the region (based on merit) and you make
> them the sixth just for the sake of regional diversity, you are
> harming the 3rd seed and helping the 4th seed by creating 3/5 and 4/6
> matchups.  At this point in the season, you have earned your seed at
> regionals, and should have to play whoever else has earned their
> corresponding seed.  Especially when it gets to semis or finals, you
> can't account for sectional affiliation.
>
> Jack
> (Don't worry D Rich, I hate Bigley too)

It sounds like Kansas feels Arkansas is an easier opponent and is
scared of UNT.
Re: South Regionals... [message #20277 is a reply to message #20276] Wed, 22 April 2009 16:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
KK26
Messages: 95
Registered: October 2008
Member
On Apr 22, 5:49 pm, kdo...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Apr 22, 3:12 pm, Jack <Jac...@ku.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 22, 2:57 pm, david...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 22, 2:47 pm, Clrydin34 <clry...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 22, 2:15 pm, david...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > > I realize that the bracket was formed by the overall seeding each team
> > > > > got, but can they not switch some spots around.  The way it looks
> > > > > right now is that the Texas Section will battle it out in the top and
> > > > > the Ozark Section will battle it out in the bottom.  Can they not
> > > > > switch Texas State/Wash U or UNT/Arkansas?  I don't think that would
> > > > > make that big of a deal.
>
> > > > I understand your argument, but hypothetically... Texas State is the 5-
> > > > seed, that puts them in a second round matchup against the 4-seed. If
> > > > you switch them, they have to play the 3-seed which you could argue is
> > > > a disadvantage they don't deserve, and Arkansas is also at a
> > > > disadvantage having to play the them, as opposed to the team that
> > > > deserves to be the 6-seed.
>
> > > > I completely understand what you are saying, but teams could be
> > > > considered at a disadvantage if you switch seeding based on matchups.
>
> > > > -casey
>
> > > I would just like to see the teams in the semis play teams that would
> > > not be from their own section.
>
> > > D Rich
> > > (that better Bigley)
>
> > I just don't really see how sectional affiliation should be a factor.
> > This isn't a tournament where regional diversity of competition should
> > play any role in scheduling (at least not a role that outweighs more
> > merit-based factors).  If two Texan teams are deemed to be the 4th and
> > 5th best teams in the region, they should be playing each other; it
> > shouldn't matter than they're both Texan teams.  Like Casey said, if a
> > team is the 5th best team in the region (based on merit) and you make
> > them the sixth just for the sake of regional diversity, you are
> > harming the 3rd seed and helping the 4th seed by creating 3/5 and 4/6
> > matchups.  At this point in the season, you have earned your seed at
> > regionals, and should have to play whoever else has earned their
> > corresponding seed.  Especially when it gets to semis or finals, you
> > can't account for sectional affiliation.
>
> > Jack
> > (Don't worry D Rich, I hate Bigley too)
>
> It sounds like Kansas feels Arkansas is an easier opponent and is
> scared of UNT.

I don't think anyone from Kansas is saying that. Especially with K-
rich apparently being out with due to his appendix (if this is in fact
true I feel awful for him, I would have loved to played against one of
the best the South has to offer, and hope he heals up fast).


-KK
Re: South Regionals... [message #20293 is a reply to message #20263] Wed, 22 April 2009 18:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Alex DW
Messages: 21
Registered: April 2009
Junior Member
> D Rich
> (Still trying to figure out which Grad school will accept me next year
> so I can use my last year of eligibility)

I would suggest the West Coast. Weather is beautiful and so are the
girls (as long as you don't go to Stanford). Personally, I think it
is pretty awesome that sectional rivalries will be born out in full at
regionals. Good luck to everyone and much love from the NW.

-DW
(Now of Stanford)

P.S. - A little birdy told me that Houston might not be attending. 15
team regionals anybody?
Re: South Regionals... [message #20305 is a reply to message #20293] Wed, 22 April 2009 19:09 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ncwohl31
Messages: 43
Registered: November 2008
Member
> P.S. - A little birdy told me that Houston might not be attending.  15
> team regionals anybody?

Really??
Re: South Regionals... [message #20306 is a reply to message #20293] Wed, 22 April 2009 19:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ncwohl31
Messages: 43
Registered: November 2008
Member
> P.S. - A little birdy told me that Houston might not be attending.  15
> team regionals anybody?

Really? I was kinda looking forward to a re-match of the 2005 Forth
Worth Bowl
Re: South Regionals... [message #20318 is a reply to message #20277] Wed, 22 April 2009 20:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Jack
Messages: 46
Registered: September 2008
Member
On Apr 22, 6:07 pm, Kevin Kelly <kell...@ku.edu> wrote:
> On Apr 22, 5:49 pm, kdo...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 22, 3:12 pm, Jack <Jac...@ku.edu> wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 22, 2:57 pm, david...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 22, 2:47 pm, Clrydin34 <clry...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Apr 22, 2:15 pm, david...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > > > I realize that the bracket was formed by the overall seeding each team
> > > > > > got, but can they not switch some spots around.  The way it looks
> > > > > > right now is that the Texas Section will battle it out in the top and
> > > > > > the Ozark Section will battle it out in the bottom.  Can they not
> > > > > > switch Texas State/Wash U or UNT/Arkansas?  I don't think that would
> > > > > > make that big of a deal.
>
> > > > > I understand your argument, but hypothetically... Texas State is the 5-
> > > > > seed, that puts them in a second round matchup against the 4-seed.. If
> > > > > you switch them, they have to play the 3-seed which you could argue is
> > > > > a disadvantage they don't deserve, and Arkansas is also at a
> > > > > disadvantage having to play the them, as opposed to the team that
> > > > > deserves to be the 6-seed.
>
> > > > > I completely understand what you are saying, but teams could be
> > > > > considered at a disadvantage if you switch seeding based on matchups.
>
> > > > > -casey
>
> > > > I would just like to see the teams in the semis play teams that would
> > > > not be from their own section.
>
> > > > D Rich
> > > > (that better Bigley)
>
> > > I just don't really see how sectional affiliation should be a factor.
> > > This isn't a tournament where regional diversity of competition should
> > > play any role in scheduling (at least not a role that outweighs more
> > > merit-based factors).  If two Texan teams are deemed to be the 4th and
> > > 5th best teams in the region, they should be playing each other; it
> > > shouldn't matter than they're both Texan teams.  Like Casey said, if a
> > > team is the 5th best team in the region (based on merit) and you make
> > > them the sixth just for the sake of regional diversity, you are
> > > harming the 3rd seed and helping the 4th seed by creating 3/5 and 4/6
> > > matchups.  At this point in the season, you have earned your seed at
> > > regionals, and should have to play whoever else has earned their
> > > corresponding seed.  Especially when it gets to semis or finals, you
> > > can't account for sectional affiliation.
>
> > > Jack
> > > (Don't worry D Rich, I hate Bigley too)
>
> > It sounds like Kansas feels Arkansas is an easier opponent and is
> > scared of UNT.
>
> I don't think anyone from Kansas is saying that. Especially with K-
> rich apparently being out with due to his appendix (if this is in fact
> true I feel awful for him, I would have loved to played against one of
> the best the South has to offer, and hope he heals up fast).
>
> -KK

Actually, that's pretty much what I was saying. Scared to death of
the Texas section. You caught me.
Re: South Regionals... [message #20323 is a reply to message #20318] Wed, 22 April 2009 21:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stu
Messages: 7
Registered: April 2009
Junior Member
Damnit Jack, now Karl knows he's in your head.

Fuck seeds. Win your games. We are playing in our-kansas. There
better be cheap cigarettes there.
Re: South Regionals... [message #20324 is a reply to message #20318] Wed, 22 April 2009 21:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stu
Messages: 7
Registered: April 2009
Junior Member
Anybody know women's seeding?
Re: South Regionals... [message #20325 is a reply to message #20293] Wed, 22 April 2009 21:25 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rhb
Messages: 35
Registered: October 2008
Member
On Apr 22, 8:24 pm, Alex DW <kadrl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > D Rich
> > (Still trying to figure out which Grad school will accept me next year
> > so I can use my last year of eligibility)
>
> I would suggest the West Coast.  Weather is beautiful and so are the
> girls (as long as you don't go to Stanford).  Personally, I think it
> is pretty awesome that sectional rivalries will be born out in full at
> regionals.  Good luck to everyone and much love from the NW.
>
> -DW
> (Now of Stanford)
>
> P.S. - A little birdy told me that Houston might not be attending.  15
> team regionals anybody?

You know, I for sure thought when you moved out to Stanford you would
forget all about the plain ole' South Region and move on to the glitz
and glam of the NW. What is it the grass isn't greener over there?
Re: South Regionals... [message #20330 is a reply to message #20323] Wed, 22 April 2009 22:00 Go to previous messageGo to next message
jacob.jkp05
Messages: 53
Registered: October 2008
Member
On Apr 22, 11:19 pm, Stu <snu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Damnit Jack, now Karl knows he's in your head.
>
> Fuck seeds. Win your games. We are playing in our-kansas. There
> better be cheap cigarettes there.

http://www.arkansas.gov/atcb/min_price.html
Re: South Regionals... [message #20335 is a reply to message #20325] Wed, 22 April 2009 22:43 Go to previous messageGo to next message
rcheskin
Messages: 19
Registered: December 2008
Junior Member
> > I would suggest the West Coast.  Weather is beautiful and so are the
> > girls (as long as you don't go to Stanford).

SLAM Superfly! It sounds like there hasnt been any improvement over
WUWU's looks (jk WUWU, you guys are hot).

I'm pumped for potential second round matchups provided that teams
hold seed. The 6 v 3 game gives WashU a chance to avenge its 2 losses
to Arkansas at Sectionals (on a personal note, that 2nd loss was
absolutely brutal in such a physical and hard fought game). Texas A&M
can prove their win over Kansas at Centex was not a fluke in the 2 v 7
game. UNT and A&M can have a Texas style sectionals re-match, and
then there is TUFF vs LSU. But nobody cares because LSU is in the
'Bama section.
Re: South Regionals... [message #20354 is a reply to message #20324] Thu, 23 April 2009 05:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Abby
Messages: 3
Registered: March 2009
Junior Member
Women's Seedings: http://www.upa.org/scores/tourn.cgi?div=122&id=5929
Re: South Regionals... [message #20357 is a reply to message #20335] Thu, 23 April 2009 05:23 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Shabadoo
Messages: 15
Registered: October 2008
Junior Member
>
> I'm pumped for potential second round matchups provided that teams
> hold seed.  The 6 v 3 game gives WashU a chance to avenge its 2 losses
> to Arkansas at Sectionals (on a personal note, that 2nd loss was
> absolutely brutal in such a physical and hard fought game).  Texas A&M
> can prove their win over Kansas at Centex was not a fluke in the 2 v 7
> game.  UNT and A&M can have a Texas style sectionals re-match, and
> then there is TUFF vs LSU.  But nobody cares because LSU is in the
> 'Bama section.

There's a Bama section? First I've heard of it.

-Joey
Re: South Regionals... [message #20406 is a reply to message #20324] Thu, 23 April 2009 09:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kate
Messages: 20
Registered: October 2008
Junior Member
On Apr 22, 11:23 pm, Stu <snu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anybody know women's seeding?

Of course, Stu, you would care more about the womens' seedings. Lets
not forget who your favorite team is to coach...
Re: South Regionals... [message #20427 is a reply to message #20406] Thu, 23 April 2009 10:36 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stu
Messages: 7
Registered: April 2009
Junior Member
Wow, way to go Ozark women! 1,2,5,6! Two bids I assume?

And yes Kate, TSUnami will always have a special place in my heart.
Did we lose a game between Centex and Nationals? Fool's Fest doesn't
count b/c I was with the Z alum. I did like your sideline advice for
the KU boys. I believe it went "Always listen to Stu!" Makes me look
infallible.

Rock Chalk Little Rock!

P.S. Thanks for the cigarette pricing breakdown Jacob.
Re: South Regionals... [message #20546 is a reply to message #20325] Thu, 23 April 2009 22:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Alex DW
Messages: 21
Registered: April 2009
Junior Member
> You know, I for sure thought when you moved out to Stanford you would
> forget all about the plain ole'SouthRegion and move on to the glitz
> and glam of the NW. What is it the grass isn't greener over there?

Something about tournaments in forty degree rain and twenty mph winds
that brings a section closer together. Ozarks for life.
Re: South Regionals... [message #20564 is a reply to message #20546] Fri, 24 April 2009 01:08 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Stu
Messages: 7
Registered: April 2009
Junior Member
You wanna be the best, win your games. Everyone has to play in the
same weather, win your games.

Did I mention win your games?

Win, or go home. We don't get paid to do this, fight for your pride!

sTupac
Re: South Regionals... [message #20605 is a reply to message #18731] Fri, 24 April 2009 08:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
The Dick Formerly Kno
Messages: 189
Registered: September 2008
Senior Member
Any and all eligible Open South Region teams that did not qualify but
are interested in attending, please contact me asap. You may find
yourself playing in Little Rock tomorrow if you hurry.

Dennis Tarasi
South Open RC
515-419-4110 (preferred)
isaratd at hotmail.com
Re: South Regionals... [message #20608 is a reply to message #20605] Fri, 24 April 2009 08:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
D Rich
Messages: 19
Registered: September 2008
Junior Member
If nobody contacts you in time, can we have a South Region Alumni team
take the final spot.
Re: South Regionals... [message #20619 is a reply to message #20608] Fri, 24 April 2009 09:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
carick15
Messages: 11
Registered: November 2008
Junior Member
dear university of houston,

I understand not wanting to make the trip for a double elimination
bracket, but I don't understand waiting until the last minute to give
your definite answer to the RC.

lame move houston, I'm sure a number of ozark teams would've been able
to make the trip.
Infact, I wish OU was going to be there (or whichever ozark team that
finished higher).

maybe there's still time to get a squad in, and maybe we'll just have
to play a 15 team regionals----

------rickner
tx state

when club regionals is in florida, I play sectionals knowing the
answer I'm giving the RC.
Re: South Regionals... [message #20624 is a reply to message #20619] Fri, 24 April 2009 09:50 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Kevin
Messages: 28
Registered: September 2008
Junior Member
Oklahoma will be taking the 16th spot at regionals. The format will be
the same as what's on the UPA website, with some adjustments in the
teams.

-Kevin
The regional coordinator's roommate
Re: South Regionals... [message #20758 is a reply to message #20608] Sat, 25 April 2009 08:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
ncwohl31
Messages: 43
Registered: November 2008
Member
Kansas 15 - Miss St 5
Truman St 15 - LSU 12
Missouri 15 - Texas A&M 11
Re: South Regionals... [message #20759 is a reply to message #20608] Sat, 25 April 2009 09:01 Go to previous message
ncwohl31
Messages: 43
Registered: November 2008
Member
UNT 16 - Harding 15
Previous Topic:College All-Star Alumni vs Team USA Showcase game at Nationals
Next Topic:D-III Nationals - Top 25 (4-24-09)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Feb 25 10:06:34 PST 2020
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.0RC2.
Copyright ©2001-2009 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software